<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Regionerate's Development Blog &#187; Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/category/bugs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog</link>
	<description>The Making of an Automatic Layout Enforcement Tool for the C# Programming Language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>HOWTO: Get Regionerate to Run on Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/11/howto-get-regionerate-to-run-on-visual-studio-2010-beta-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/11/howto-get-regionerate-to-run-on-visual-studio-2010-beta-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Known Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio Addin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.7.3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Visual Studio 2010 is now officially supported. There is no need to use this workaround.
I really hoped to get Regionerate running quickly on Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2.
Unfortunately, since there are several breaking changes with Visual Studio 2010&#8217;s extensibility model, I found myself messing around with it too much.
I&#8217;m not giving up, but I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Update: </span></strong><a href="http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/04/visual-studio-2010-officially-supported.html"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Visual Studio 2010 is now officially supported</span></strong></a><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">. There is no need to use this workaround.</span></strong></h3>
<p>I really hoped to get Regionerate running quickly on Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, since there are several breaking changes with Visual Studio 2010&#8217;s extensibility model, I found myself messing around with it too much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not giving up, but I just need to clear an afternoon for it. Meanwhile, Since I&#8217;ve been getting a whole bunch of requests for quick support for 2010, here&#8217;s a quick workaround:</p>
<ol>
<li>Go to &#8220;<em>%programfiles%\Regionerate&#8221;</em>.</li>
<li>Make a copy of &#8220;<em>Regionerate.VS2005.AddIn</em>&#8221; and call it &#8220;<em>Regionerate.VS2010.AddIn</em>&#8220;.</li>
<li>Open it with notepad, change <em>Extensibility/HostApplication/Version </em>to <em>10.0 and save the file.</em></li>
<li><strong></strong> Open up <em>regedit.exe</em>.</li>
<li>Go to <em>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Visual Studio\10.0\AutomationOptions\LookInFolders.</em></li>
<li>Add a string key <strong>named</strong> &#8220;<em>C:\Program Files\Regionerate\</em>&#8221; (or wherever you had Regionerate installed)</li>
<li>Start Visual Studio 2010 and go to <em>Tools/Regionerate Settings</em>.</li>
<li>Turn off <em>Automatically collapse regions after Regionerating.</em> (Yes, they won&#8217;t collapse until I fix it)</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Thanks for Mr. Bungle for reminding me to add step 4-6. Mike Patton enthusiasts FTW!</p>
<p>Add your comments here if you have any problems using this workaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/11/howto-get-regionerate-to-run-on-visual-studio-2010-beta-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do you use attributes the most?</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/09/where-do-you-use-attributes-the-most.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/09/where-do-you-use-attributes-the-most.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bug Fixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.7.3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Where do you use attributes the most?(surveys)
There&#8217;s a performance issue regarding multiple attributes on properties, and instead of solving this, we can just easily shift this performance problem to methods, where people supposedly use less attributes. Yeah, I know, pretty lame solution, but its fast!
I was wondering where people use attributes the most, so I will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><noscript><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2056386/">Where do you use attributes the most?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">surveys</a>)</span><br />
</noscript>There&#8217;s a <a href="http://trac2.assembla.com/Regionerate/ticket/45">performance issue regarding multiple attributes on properties</a>, and instead of solving this, we can just easily shift this performance problem to methods, where people supposedly use less attributes. Yeah, I know, pretty lame solution, but its fast!</p>
<p>I was wondering where people use attributes the most, so I will appreciate it if you could answer this short poll.</p>
<p><script src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2056386.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2009/09/where-do-you-use-attributes-the-most.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Work!</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2008/07/back-to-work.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2008/07/back-to-work.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bug Fixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2008/07/back-to-work.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long delay, I&#8217;m getting back to an occasional work session on Regionerate.
Over the past 6 months I got a lot of feature requests by e-mail, and I would like to thank everybody for sending great ideas.
Since releasing a version can be a long procedure, I would like to change my release habits with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a long delay, I&#8217;m getting back to an occasional work session on Regionerate.</p>
<p>Over the past 6 months I got a lot of feature requests by e-mail, and I would like to thank everybody for sending great ideas.</p>
<p>Since releasing a version can be a long procedure, I would like to change my release habits with Regionerate and stop releasing versions for bug fixes. Now that the source code is freely available at <a href="http://www.assembla.com/spaces/regionerate">Assembla</a>, bug fixes can be obtained by getting the source code and compiling.</p>
<p>I will release a new version for new features only, and of course, those releases will include all the bug fixes that were committed until the release date.</p>
<p>v0.7 is coming up with a couple of new features and a couple of bug fixes.</p>
<p>Thank you all for your patience and kind words over the last months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2008/07/back-to-work.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slaughtering Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/slaughtering-comments.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/slaughtering-comments.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Known Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.6.5.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/slaughtering-comments.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Referring to this post in the Bug Reports Forum, Unfortunately I can&#8217;t think of a way to completely solve this at the moment.
See, the problem is that if the symbol is empty, any comment block that starts with at least two slashes will be considered as a Regionerated comment region. For example, if the symbol [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to <a href="http://forums.regionerate.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&#038;t=88&amp;sid=ecc1ec2441c590bd0e6bf96432eff871">this post</a> in the <a href="http://forums.regionerate.net/viewforum.php?f=6&#038;sid=ecc1ec2441c590bd0e6bf96432eff871">Bug Reports Forum</a>, Unfortunately I can&#8217;t think of a way to completely solve this at the moment.</p>
<p>See, the problem is that if the symbol is empty, any comment block that starts with at least two slashes will be considered as a Regionerated comment region. For example, if the symbol is&#8221;*&#8221;, Regionerated comment regions would look like:</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">// * Private Fields (3)</span></p>
<p>But if the symbol is &#8220;&#8221; (empty), the same region would look like</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">// Private Fields (3)</span></p>
<p>This looks exactly like any other comment, and must be removed before actually Regionerating to prevent junk from piling up. However, I did minimize the bug&#8217;s severity by allowing triple-slash comment blocks such as Xml documentation <summary> blocks. (which were the main reason for reporting this bug)</p>
<p>Would love to hear any ideas you may have on solving this one.<br /></summary></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/slaughtering-comments.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support for Operators</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/support-for-operators.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/support-for-operators.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bug Fixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.6.4.5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/support-for-operators.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up until now&#160;operators were left at the bottom of the class. This is fixed in v0.6.4.5. Operators will be recognized as ordinary methods.
I was thinking of creating an &#8220;IsOperator&#8221; filter (similar&#160;to the &#8220;IsConstructor&#8220;) in the PutMethods statement. This will allow you to create regions for your operators.
However, since most people do not overload operators,&#160;I decided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until now&nbsp;operators were left at the bottom of the class. This is fixed in v0.6.4.5. Operators will be recognized as ordinary methods.</p>
<p>I was thinking of creating an &#8220;<em>IsOperator</em>&#8221; filter (similar&nbsp;to the &#8220;<em>IsConstructor</em>&#8220;) in the <em>PutMethods</em> statement. This will allow you to create regions for your operators.</p>
<p>However, since most people do not overload operators,&nbsp;I decided to hold on this, until I see that it is actually needed.</p>
<p>So if you want to be able to create regions for your overloaded operators, let me know by commenting this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/08/support-for-operators.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>/* */ Comments And Multiple Types In Generics</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/comments-and-multiple-types-in-generics.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/comments-and-multiple-types-in-generics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/comments-and-multiple-types-in-generics.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of issues which I became aware of today:

/* */ comment blocks are not attached to members.
Multiple types in Generic members ( e.g. IDictionary&#038;lt int, string &#038;gt) are not handled.

Both issues will be fixed tonight, watch for comments for a new version. 
Thanks to Lior and Tomer for finding the bugs.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of issues which I became aware of today:
<ol>
<li>/* */ comment blocks are not attached to members.</li>
<li>Multiple types in Generic members ( e.g. <em>IDictionary&#038;lt int, string &#038;gt</em>) are not handled.</li>
</ol>
<p>Both issues will be fixed tonight, watch for comments for a new version. </p>
<p>Thanks to Lior and Tomer for finding the bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/comments-and-multiple-types-in-generics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protected? Sure. Internal? Why Not? Protected Internal? Are You Insane?</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/protected-sure-internal-why-not-protected-internal-are-you-insane.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/protected-sure-internal-why-not-protected-internal-are-you-insane.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v0.4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/protected-sure-internal-why-not-protected-internal-are-you-insane.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurray, a critical bug!
Don&#8217;t even bother Regionerating protected internal members with Regionerate v0.4.0.0. It goes insane. I will have a fix out tonight. Watch for comments on this post.
Thanks to Lior for finding the bug!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurray, a critical bug!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even bother Regionerating <em>protected internal </em>members with Regionerate v0.4.0.0. It goes insane. I will have a fix out tonight. Watch for comments on this post.</p>
<p>Thanks to Lior for finding the bug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2007/06/protected-sure-internal-why-not-protected-internal-are-you-insane.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

