<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the New Code Layout Editor Be Online?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/01/should-the-new-code-layout-editor-be-online.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/01/should-the-new-code-layout-editor-be-online.html</link>
	<description>The Making of an Automatic Layout Enforcement Tool for the C# Programming Language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ewer</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/01/should-the-new-code-layout-editor-be-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-6250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/?p=222#comment-6250</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the online idea at all.  The code layout templates should go in the source code repository with the project, not on an external web site.  If you need access to those templates from different machines, then you should use a distributed source control repository or put them in DropBox.  You shouldn&#039;t be trying to solve the &quot;universal access&quot; problem.  Others already have tools for that and they work quite well.  Instead, focus your energy on building the best layout designer you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the online idea at all.  The code layout templates should go in the source code repository with the project, not on an external web site.  If you need access to those templates from different machines, then you should use a distributed source control repository or put them in DropBox.  You shouldn&#8217;t be trying to solve the &#8220;universal access&#8221; problem.  Others already have tools for that and they work quite well.  Instead, focus your energy on building the best layout designer you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rauchy</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/01/should-the-new-code-layout-editor-be-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>rauchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/?p=222#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>pj,

Is there a bad way of interesting? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pj,</p>
<p>Is there a bad way of interesting? <img src='http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pj</title>
		<link>http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/2010/01/should-the-new-code-layout-editor-be-online.html/comment-page-1#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>pj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rauchy.net/regionerate/blog/?p=222#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>Ideally there&#039;d be a central place from/to which I could save/access my layouts. Like a google docs account or something like that. Then I could get to them from any machine. As far as the interface goes, I don&#039;t care too much as long as its easy to use and it&#039;s interesting for you to build (interesting in a good way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally there&#8217;d be a central place from/to which I could save/access my layouts. Like a google docs account or something like that. Then I could get to them from any machine. As far as the interface goes, I don&#8217;t care too much as long as its easy to use and it&#8217;s interesting for you to build (interesting in a good way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
